[2025:RJ-JP:47760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18054/2025 Rekha Joshi D/o Giriraj Joshi, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Village Siras, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondents be directed to key/OMR Sheet of the provide the answer examination for the post of Lecturer-School Education (English) and thereby allow the Petitioner to have inspection of her answer sheet. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to call the petitioner in the process of document verification and if petitioner succeed then consider for appointment to the post of Lecturer English with all consequential benefits. [2025:RJ-JP:47760] (2 of 3) [CW-18054/2025] iii) If any mistake is found in the answer sheets of the Petitioner on checking then the same be rechecked and the Petitioner be declared successful and respondents be directed to give appointment to the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 15.01.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1081/2018 titled as Samay Singh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Samay Singh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Samay Singh Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra) with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of [2025:RJ-JP:47760] (3 of 3) [CW-18054/2025] speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /215