SMT SUSHILA KAPOOR v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COM ANDO
CW/1044/2008 · 2025-10-09
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1044/2008 Smt. Sushila Kapoor Wife of Shri R.g. Kapoor, 36, Vidyut Nagar, Nehru Road, Bhilwara. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nidhi Bhawan, Vidyut Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
2. Managing Committee, Husband Memorial Senior Secondary School, Ajmer Through Its Secretary.
3. The Commissioner, Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Tantia, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 09/10/2025 : The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayers :-
“(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to provide the monthly pension to the petitioner as usual with regard to the PPO No.9385; (ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to make the payments of arrears of ‘month pension’ @ 18% interest at the month rates from the month (April, 2007) of illegal stoppage of the pension; (iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed alternatively to refund the total deposited provident fund money and family pension contribution money alongwith interest accrued therein till the date of payment. The monthly pension already paid is not be deducted from the final payment as that was the result of social security provided to the petitioner. Hence, the amount paid being monthly pension may not be adjusted with the refundable total amount; (iv) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents; and (v) Heavy cost may kindly be awarded for dragging this poor retired teacher into unwarranted litigation”.
[2025:RJ-JP:41087] (2 of 2) [CW-1044/2008]
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the payment of pension/retiral benefits dues has already been made to the petitioner. In this regard, in compliance of the order dt.11.01.2017 passed by this Court, an affidavit has also been filed by the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while supporting the aforesaid submission, has prayed that the present writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. In view of above, nothing survives in the present writ petition and, therefore, the same is, hereby, disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ASHOK