IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVJ + TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE , :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 708 OF 2025 , Betwee n : 1. Uruchintala Aarif, S/o Uruchintala Apsar Basha,12-206, Padamatigeri, Tadipatri, Ananthapur, Andhra Pradesh. 2. Naguladinne Mahaboob Basha, S/o Naguladdine Shabbeer Basha, 15/1308, Sanjeevanagar lst Road, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu Andhra Pradesh. 3. Naguladinne Shabbir Basha, S/o Naguladdine Mahaboob Sab,15/1308 sanjeevanagar 1 st Road, Tadipatri, Ananthapuramu Andhra Pradesh Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, Tadipatri Town Police Station, Ananthapur District. / Respondents Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (old Section 438 of Cr.P.C,) is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the S.H.O./I.O. ofTadipatri Town P.S, Ananthapuram District in Crime No.90 of 2024 dated 13.05.2024 u/s 147,148,188, 353, 332, r/w 149 lPC. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M SHANMUKHA TEJA Advocate for the Petitioners and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondents, the Court made the following -. _,7fe7 APHCO10O34772025 Ei'..T | IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (special Original Jurisdiction) [3365] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR i I quINAL PETITION NO: 708 of 20_2£ Between : 1.URUCHINTALA MRIFu S/O URUCHINTALA APSAR BASHA,12- 206, PADAMATIGERl, TADIPATRl, ANANTHAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.NAGULADINNE MAHABOOB BASHAu S/O NAGULADDINE SHABBEER BASHA, 15/1308, SANJEEVANAGAR IST ROAD, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAMU ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.NAGULADINNE SHABBIR BASHAw S/0 NAGULADDINE MAHABOOB SAB, 15/1308 SANJEEVANAGAR IST ROAD, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAMU ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1 -TpHREosSETcAuTTEoR9,F HAINGDHHRcA6uPRPfDEoSFH, REP, BY ITS PUBLIC ANDHRA PRADESH, vELAGAPUDl, AMARAVATl, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIPATRI TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): counsel for the pet-ItiOner/accused(S): 1. M SHANMUKHA TEJA counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: \ ORDER: This Crjml®nal petition under section 482 of BharatI.ya NagarI-k suraksha sanhl®ta, 2023 I-S filed on behalf of the petjtl'oners/accused, seeking antI'CiPatOry bail in connectI-On With Crime No.90 of 2024 of Tadl'pathrj Town police Station, Ananthapuram DI-Strict, registered for the offences punl'shable under sectI-OnS 147,148, 188, 353, 332 read with 149 lPC.. 2. Heard learned counsel on both sides and perused the record. 3. The petitioners contend that they are I'nnOCent and unreasonably they are accused of these offences and have reason to believe that they may be arrested. 4. Respondent contends that the peace I-n the socl-ety was dI-Sturbed i and the property was damaged. The presence of the petI-tjOners in Tadipatri js likely to create further unrest. 5. The material on record dI-SCIosed the names ofbI'g and not so bI'g persons belonging to two leading political partI.eS - One, the then ruling party, the other, the then oppositI-On Party. The incident occurred while thI'S democracy was gearI®ng up for elections to parlI-ament and assembly. The allegatl®ons are that the rl-vat groups of persons, large in number holding weapons, bet-ng led by their leaders, had their own plans ff:€~J, +\ / 3 r, drawn up, engaged ®In Pelting Stones and Caused damage tO the Vehicles and injuries to police. ¢ ` ® 6. Record further shows that the inVeStigat'lOn Progressed, statements of certain witnesses were recorded, necessary mahazarS were prepared, certain items were seized and some of the accused were H 1 arrested. Broad statements apart, One could not notice any specific overt acts except the verbal utterances on part of the petitioner. The incident, though created panic, is one that does not seem to require any custodial interrogation. Given the fact that the Petitioner iS Ordinary resident Of the area, minding his own avocation; granting the prayer does not dent the smooth investigation. However, there iS need tO hedge the emotions Of rival groups, so aS tO allow the Peace tO thrive and Perpetuate. Therefore, conditioning them by Certain terms WOuld Serve the Process of justice well. 7. Observations made here are limited tO the Present Proceedings. 8. ln the result, this Petition iS allowed in the following terms:- ln the event of arrest of the pet-It'lOnerS herein/ accused, they Shall be enlarged on bail on their executing personal bonds for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each with two Sureties Of the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned`[giv 4 arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners/accused shall mark their attendance before the Investigating officer on 7th and 21st of every month between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM for a period of three months or till filing of the charge sheet whichever is earlier. The petitioners/ accused shall make themselves available for investigation by a police ' I officer as and when required, and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. The petitioners/accused shall not indulge in similar acts of crime. From the time they avail the bail, they shall stay away from Tadipatri town for a fortnight. //TRUE COPY// Fo Tol +_ - sd/-KL J. RAJA BABu ASSISTANT-`-RErG[STRAR fgrrgr[_ -- __ SECTION OFFICER ,I/ 1. The Statl®on House Officer, Tadipatri Town Police Station, Ananthapur 7 District. 2, One CC to SRl. M SHANMUKHA TEJAAdvocate [opuc] zzr` 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.#7 [OUT] 4. One spare copy ER i \ HIGH COURT DR VRKS, J DATED :28/01 /2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.708 of 2025 ALLOWED !o" fEB 2#!5 C.-; I.