Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45879 (RAJ)

BADRILAL S/O SH. KANHAIYALAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3676/2023 · 2025-11-07

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44759] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.3676/2023 Badrilal S/o Sh. Kanhaiyalal Meena, aged about 56 Years, R/o 10-C-2, Mahaveer Nagar, Third Parijat Colony, Kota, (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Director General of Police (D.G.P), Police Head Quarter Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Superintendent of Police (S.P.), Kota, Anti Corruption Bureau, Kota Range, Kota Rajasthan. 4. Investigation Officer (I.O.) of Criminal Complain No. P1, 2/71/5 dated 30-09-2015, registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, Special Unit, Kota. 5. Anandi Lal Vaishnav, Presently Secretary, City Development Trust, Kota Presently Privilege, Secretariat, Jaipur. 6. Bhagwat Singh Hingad, Presently Superintendent of Police, UIT, Kota Presently Additional Superintendent of Police, Police Control Room, Nayapura, Kota. 7. Govind, Presently Tehsildar City Development Trust, Kota. 8. K.D. Choudhary, Resident of Rangbari, Kota. 9. Narayan Prasad Sharma, Resident of Krishna Nagar, Rangabari, Kota. 10. Sunil Agarwal, R/o Rangbari, Kota. 11. Ramavatar Soni, Resident of Veer Sawarkar Nagar, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Prajapat on behalf of Mr. Mukesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 07/11/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: [2025:RJ-JP:44759] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3676/2023] "It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the direction to registered the FIR against the accused and the investigation may be carried out by CID (CB) and CBI and other and further issue the direction to the investigating officer to investigate the matter fairly, properly and impartially and take the immediate step with regard to filing of Charge sheet against the Accused Persons. Or an alternate Hon'ble Court may further pleased to direct thte Inspector General, ACB may be directed to remand the matter of Criminal Complaint No.71/2015 dated 30-09- 2015 for reinvestigation which may be carried out under the supervision of I.G. ACB Kota range Kota. Any other appropriate order or direction as may be deemed expedient in the facts and circumstances of the case be issued in favour of the petitioner." 2. Bare perusal of the prayer would reveal that the petition is totally misconceived as alternative procedure is available under Cr.P.C./ now in B.N.S.S. for registration of FIR and so far as alternative prayer is concerned, the same is not comprehensible and nothing has been mentioned in the petition, so as to show power of the Inspector General, ACB, to conduct re-investigation as prayed. 3. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed being misconceived, devoid of any substance and merit. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/23