Nakkina Shyam Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/1622/2025 · 2025-02-18
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45876 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45876 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[3327] lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA` PRADESH AT AMAR MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUL TWO THOUSAN.D AND TWENTY FIVE : PRESENT: ```{-ife:^` THE HONOURABLE DR JUsTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RA<O IA N'o| 2 OF2025 IN CRLP NO: 1622 OF 2025 Between : AND Nakkina Shyam Kumar, S/a. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 28 years, residing near Durga Tempi6,,-Srirampuram, Gudivada, Krishna Dl-strict. ... PetitI-Oner/Accused The State ofAndhra Pradesh, 'rep., by its public prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravath'i:;I Rep by Sringavarapu Kota Police Station, Vizianagaram ...Respondent Petition under section 528,`-Qf.BNSS / 482 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to F`eiax the Condition imposed by this HonJble Court order dt.19.02.2025 in CrLP.No.1622 of 2025 in so far as f{petitioner shall appear before the Jurisdictional police Station, attend the police station on every Friday in between 10,q-S`?m and o5.00 pm till filing of chargesheetJI, in the interests ofjustI-Ce, Pending c!iSposal of CRLP No. 1622 of 2025, on the file of the HI-gh Court. J' counsel for the Petitioner :Sri. P-APuDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY : ic.I Counsel for the Respondent :RUB.k]C PROSECUTOR .. . I . The Court made the following QRE5ER ' =\/.t-: - I.I-. ,:=..'i.. . --.i i.*}. - ,.*.. 5 £cHeard the learned codrf§eI'for the petitioner and learned Assistant 'i `.-..- i. .. Public Prosecutor. The learned Single Judge-of this Court, in W|P.No.7622 of 2025, dated O1|07I2025, directed tha€.`a!! FIRs registered against the petitioner be consolidated. ]t was further ciirected that the first FIR, i.e., the one Eh'. _ i. = -~i initially registered against the. petitioner, shall be considered for further proceed[-ngs, while the rest of th-6i FiRs are stayed. That being so, with res-pee±:;f,:+to an alleged incidentJ if an FIR js registered and subsequently multiple FIRs are filed, all such further FIRs -.''-S.-..-+..:: ..€3. •.i . must be taken into account-'a-;-I--th; statements recorded under sectiori 161 of the Cr.P.C., as per the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in MOHD[ ZUBAIR V. STATE (NCI ®F DELHI) AND OTHERS1. . .. ``.`* .4= •- ,`J,. ft':i. -..;I.-. [n light of this, the present application is a[Iowedl The conditiori .\ _-i_' imposed on the petitioner by trieJ6rder dated 19.02.2025 in Cr[.i.No.1622 I.i j!rr2 I -'',`r .. ..
of 2025 is relaxed to the extent that the petitioner shall now attend the --.. . .._I~ ?_.'' ..+i_...i'-Jl'i police station every Friday betwiteem-1`0:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, To) Accordingly, I.A|NoI2 ofrty£i;5=]£`+is`` is allowed.7' '_{ +_s: \-'.-`~ts...|= -~. -1.:- 1 ((2023) 16 SCC 764) sD/-K.J.RAJA BABU ASS!STAN ~, !i#FREngE COPYII S ` 1+ , =±{ ``` -_I +.-. = 7.,.:.-. ''\ \`'| }4q `.~` lSTRAR
I# \\
1. TheSessionsJudge,Vl-zianaJdaram, #7 :_-:I., - .; `_._
2. The Station House Officet,<;`'a§ri`ngavarapu Kota Police Station, Z# vI'Zianagaram. (By SPEED,3p6sT)
3. Nakkina Shyam Kumar, S/6. venkateswara Rao, Aged about 28 years',- residing near Durga Tend'jb{`ir6¥'`,`i:-§rirampuram, Gudl-vada, Krishna District. Z (By SPEED POST)
4. One CC to SRI. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDYAdvocate [OPUC] z7
5. Two CCs to Public ProsecutQ_r``(AP) High Court ofA.P., Amaravati Z# [OUT]-
6. One spare copy P •--I r `-rf'_. _,I:_?-i . i , . _ . l`} \ lir`.i lt :i-.3p'i<±=: .:I i :``J . r ,.i .I ``
HIGH COURT DR YLR,J DATED : 28/07/2025 ORDER IA.NO.2 OF 2025 lN CRLP.No.1622 of 2025 I.A.NO.2 OF 2025 lS ALLOWEE}