$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 133/2025 & CM APPL. 26897/2025 SANJAY GOEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Mr. Shorya Goel & Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocates. versus SAG INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 05.05.2025 CM APPL. 26897/2025 [Exemption] 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. C.R.P. 133/2025 3. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 18.03.2025 passed by learned District Judge- 06 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, an Application under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC seeking permission to recall a witness has been dismissed. 4. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the Petition with liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 5. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. TARA VITASTA GANJU, J MAY 5, 2025/ ha Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2025 at 14:29:43