I V » APHCQ10179622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY p TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE % PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 9162 OF 2025 0? Between: Y Suryanarayana, s/o Vemalayya, Aged about 73 Thallavalasa Village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatanam District. years, Occ; cultivation ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Tahasildar, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Village Revenue Officer, Thallavalasa village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Revenue , Guntur ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the action of the respondent Nos illegally interfering with the petitioners lawful construction 3 and 4 in of a compound wall/fencing around his assigned iand in Survey No. 190 (Ac. 0.80 cents) and his adjacent private patta iands in Thailavaiasa Viiiage, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to stop all interference and permit the petitioner to proceed with the construction of the compound wall/fencing for the protection of his mango trees and cattle shed. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos 3 & 4 their subordinates or any person acting on their behalf from interfering in any manner with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of his lands in Survey No. 190 (Ac. 0.80 cents) and his adjacent private patta lands in Thallavalasa Village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and the petitioner's construction of compound wall/fencing around his properties for protection of his mango trees and cattle shed. Pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: * APHC010179622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ [3331] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATT! WRIT PETITION NO: 9162/2025 Between: 1.Y SURYANARAYANA, S/0 VEMALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, THALLAVALASA VILLAGE, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL VISAKHAPATANAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1 THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.THE TAHASILDAR, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, THALLAVALASA VILLAGE, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): « Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature ^ of a Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the action of the respondent Nos 3 and 4 in illegally interfering with the petitioners lawful construction of a compound wall/fencing around his assigned land in Survey No. 190 (Ac. 0.80 cents) and his adjacent private patta lands in Thallavalasa Village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of Constitution of India and Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the consequently direct the respondents to stop ail interference and permit the petitioner to proceed with the construction of the compound wall/fencing for the protection of his mango trees and cattle shed and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos 3 & 4 their subordinates or any person acting on their behalf from interfering in any manner Vvith the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of his lands in Survey No. 190 (Ac. 0.80 cents) and his adjacent private patta lands in Thallavalbsa Village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and the petitioner's construction of compound wall/fencing around his properties for protection of his mango trees and cattle shed. Pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: I.SREEMANNAPAYANAVATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. Sd/- P.VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Sreemannarayana Vattikuti, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 2. 3. TF HIGH COURT DATED:25/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 9162 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS