4 ■ t IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAYv/^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \> "0 Y. I ^ II VO! 'r>li \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARtifNIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11835 OF 2025 Between: P. Subba^eddy @ Subba Rayudu, S/o. Narayana Reddy, Aged 45 years, . 10-2-554, Chennampalle Village, Bacivel, YSR Kadapa District. ■k I T\/U. U.INO ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Rbv^nue Department (Assignment), Secretariat, Amaravati, Velagapudi District. 2. The District Collector, YSR K^apa District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, BadveCYSR Kadapa District. 4. The Tahsildar, Gopavaram'^rYSR Kadapa District. \x"'' 5. Thella Ramanamma, W/o Ramaiah, Aged 50 years, R/o. Rooparampet, Badvel Town, YSR Kadapa District. Guntur > ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus / praying that in may or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not considering the petitioner's representation/request dt. any action in REF.No.E3/507/2024 dt.02.03.^^ and also not undert^ing survey and fixing the boundaries to the petitioner's land in Sy.No.79^ to an extent of Ac.0.08 cents situated at Chennampalle Village, Badvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District is 11.04.2025 and also not taking the 2""^ respondent's pursuant to letter vide illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to t^e necessary ^tion for cancelation of the fabricated patta vide Pc.No.^3m20 dt.29.03.2011 in respect of land in Sy.No.8^-2 to an extent of Ac.0.03 cents of plot no. 11-A which is claiming by 5 respondent, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Ih Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take necessary action for canceiation of the fabricated patta vide Pc.No.2'53/1420 dt.29.03.^11 in respect of land in Sy.No.k^0-2 to A which is claiming by 5 lA NO: 2 OF 2025 an extent of Ac.0.03 cents of plot no. 11- respondent pending disposal of the writ th petUi^. Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleas^to direct the 4*^ respondent to act upon the F-line application dt. 10.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner for in respect of petitioner’s land in Sy.No.7&^ to survey and fixing the boundaries an extent of Ac.O.^ cents. y Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE^-: Counsel for the Respondent No.5: — The Court made the following: % f . ■* APHC010227862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m [3329] 0 ?:L TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU WRIT PETITION NO: 1 NIMMAGADDA Between: P. Subba Reddy @ Subba Rayudu, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of A Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: r> rm »- i iui II a Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRII PETITIONNO: 11835/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4 not considering the petitioner’s representation/ dt.11.04.2025 and also not taking any action in pursuant to the 2""^ respondent’s letter vide REF No.E3/507/2024 dt. 02.03.2024 and also not undertakln'^ petitioner’s land in Sy.No.799-2 to an extent of Ac.0.08 cents situated at Chennampalle Village, Badvel Mandal, YSR Kadapa District is illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to take necessary action for cancelation of the fabricatedpatta vide Pc.No.253/1420 dt.29.03.2011 in respect of land In Sy.No. 800-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.03 cents of plot no.11-A which is claiming by 5^^ respondent and to pass such other order or orders....” in request y V<^y ou^ iiAiily me uuunudl lea LU me 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 11.04.2025 along with the F-line application dated 10.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner. against the 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated 11.04.2025 and F-line application dated 10.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner, pending with the authorities, within a reasonable time. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Government Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth Pleader for or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. in P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the a direction to dispose of the representation dated 11.04.2025 and F-line application dated 10.04.2025 Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. petitioner himself requested to issue this 6. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to consider and dispose of the representation dated along with the F-line application dated 10.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, within a period of three (03) months from the date of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 11.04.2025 receipt of a 2004 (1) see 769 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/-RA. PRABHAKAR RAO assistant registrar // ^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, fe^nue Department (Assignment), Secretariat, Amaravati, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, v'SR^adapa District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Badv^CVSR Kadapa District. 4. The Tahsildar, Gopavaram at YSR Kadapa District. 5. Thella Ramanar^ma, W/o Ramaiah, Aged 50 '/ears, R./o. Rooparampet, Badvel Town, YSR Kadapa District. 6. One CC to SRI. N ASWARTHA nMaYANA, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs^to GP FOR-REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11835 of 2025 5 t7SF^ 2025 H ^ . Current Section . DISPOSING OF THE W P WITHOUT COSTS