111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3720-2025 Date of Decision:21.04.2025 Rishav Sardana …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. V.G Jauhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of appropriate direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner, at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 25.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur and he shall be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter and take appropriate steps, in accordance with law. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the case file, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur-respondent No.2 to consider the HITESH 2025.04.21 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-3720-2025 -2 representation dated 25.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly as per law, within a period of two weeks from today. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 21.04.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.04.21 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh