Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4586 (KAR)

RAMAKRISHNA UMESH CHITRAGAR v. SMT. KEERTI W/O RAMAKRISHNA CHITRAGAR EARLIER KNOWN AS KEERTI D/O MOHANRAO CHITRAGAR DHARWADKAR

WP/102427/2023 · 2025-01-20

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:827 WP No. 102427 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102427 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: RAMAKRISHNA UMESH CHITRAGAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: EX. BSF PERSONNEL, R/O. GURLAHOSUR VILLAGE, SAVADATTI TALUK, BELAGAVI-591126. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.M. JAVED, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. KEERTI W/O. RAMAKRISHNA CHITRAGAR, (EARLIER KNOWN AS KEERTI D/O. MOHANRAO CHITRAGAR DHARWADKAR) AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. NAVA AYODHYA NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, OLD HUBBALLI, HUBBALLI-580024. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI IN CRI.MISC. NO.39/2022 ON I.A NO. II (APPLICATION FILED U/S. 125(1) CR.P.C) DATED 17.03.2023. (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:827 WP No. 102427 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following reliefs: a) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari and set aside the order passed by the Prl. Judge, Family Court, Hubballi in Cri. Misc. No.39/2022 on I.A No. II (Application filed U/s. 125(1) Cr.P.C) dated 17.03.2023. (Annexure-A) b) To pass such order as deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 2. Memo dated 08.01.2025 has been filed signed by the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under : “The counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has settled the matter with the respondent before the Lok-Adalat dated 14.12.2024, hence not intending to prosecute the above petition and seeking liberty to withdraw the same, in the interest of justice.” 3. Accepting the said memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14