Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7861 WP No. 13455 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13455 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. N.SADIYA HALEEMA W/O. MOHAMMED NAIM U1 HAQ, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO. 6/170, G.P.ROAD, G.K.MOHALLA, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313.
2.
MOHAMMED WIQASS U1 HAQ, S/O. MOHAMMED NAIM U1 HAQ N, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO. 6/170, G.P.ROAD, G.K.MOHALLA, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SUMATHI.S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
BANK OF BARODA NO. 1873/4A, RAVINDRA ARCADE, WESLLI ROAD, MANDI MAHAL, MYSURU-570 021.
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NATASHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7861 WP No. 13455 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. Her absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of February
2025. The petition is pending from four years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24