VIPIN PARASHAR ALSO KNOWN AS TIGER S/O SHRI RAJENDRA PARASHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10760/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45853 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45853 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10760/2025 Vipin Parashar Also Known As Tiger S/o Shri Rajendra Parashar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vyas Mohalla, Dausa, P.s. Kotwali, District Dausa, Current Residence At House No. 73/62A, Patel Marg, Kv No. B-247, Seetaram Vihar, Patrakar Colony, P.s. Muhana, Jaipur. At Present In Judicial Custody In Central Jail, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta with Mr. Madan Mohan Gupta and Mr. Anuj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.499/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District-Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 8 and 22(B) of NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that there is allegation of recovery of 5.74 gram MDMA, which is below the commercial quantity but that recovery was made on false and concocted grounds. Though there are 15 criminal cases pending
[2025:RJ-JP:44544] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10760/2025] against the petitioner, out of these, he has been acquitted in 4 cases, and no case of a similar nature is pending against him. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Vipin Parashar Also Known As Tiger S/o Shri Rajendra Parashar be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Shipra Path District Jaipur City (South) in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.
[2025:RJ-JP:44544] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10760/2025] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/52