SANJAY KUMAR MEENA S/O KANHAIYALAL v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/11499/2025 · 2025-10-16
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45852 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42537] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11499/2025 Sanjay Kumar Meena S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Jhopadiya, Sorsan, Baran (Raj.)- 325202 ----Petitioner Versus
1. Union Of India, Through Chairman, Centre Water Commission Sewa Bhawan, New Delhi-110001
2. Chief Engineer, Centeral Water Commission, Yamuna Basin Organization, B-5 Kalindi Bhawan, Kutub Sansthanik Marg, New Delhi-110016
3. Executive Engineer, Centeral Water Commission, Chambal Division, 84/93-96, Ajay Marg, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur - 302033
4. M/s Akriti Construction And Manpower Suppliers, Duboli, Kaptanganj Basti, Uttarpradesh
5. M/s Indrashakti Human Resources Services Pvt. Ltd, Basti, 496, Raza Bazar, Basti, U.p.-272001
6. Omprakash Gurjar, Sangod, Dist-Kota, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Bhushan Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“(i) directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into service with continuity of service and all consequential benefits, including full back wages from the date of his illegal termination till reinstatement and (ii) directions may kindly be grated to respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner along with all consequential benefits. [2025:RJ-JP:42537] (2 of 2) [CW-11499/2025] (iii) Issue any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case. (iv) Award the costs of this petition to the Petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4.
With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/48