1 2025:CGHC:1874-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 107 of 2025 Ejaz Ahmad Niyazi S/o Late Sarfuddin Niyazi Aged About 55 Years R/o House No. 1, Street No. 6, V.V. Vihar Colony, Mowa, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Superintendent of Police, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Station House OfÏcer, Police Station, Pandri, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Yashasvi Singhi, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 13 . 01 .202 5 1. Heard Ms. Yashasvi Singhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents/State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.13 18:21:17 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set-aside the FIR bearing Crime No. 29 of 2022 and Criminal Case No. 1244 of 2023 pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent Police authority to file a closure report in the FIR bearing Crime No. 29 of 2022. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 3. On perusal of the prayer made in the present petition, it appears that the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the FIR as well as criminal case pending before the Court concerned and further the prayed for directing the respondent authorities to submit a closure report. 4. Learned State counsel submits that in the present case the closure report has already been submitted before the competent Court, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayer. 5. Prayer is allowed. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as 3 withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 7. Certified copy of the order-sheet as well as copy of the FIR may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan