Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4585 (KAR)

SHANKAR S/O MARUTI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/100385/2018 · 2025-02-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3200 WP No. 100385 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.100385 OF 2018 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: SHANKAR S/O. MARUTI, AGED: 51 YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR, R/O: NO.235/A, 13TH A CROSS, A SECTOR, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S. S. GHULAPPANAVAR AND SRI MALLIKARJUNASWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION AND GROUND WATER DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION AND GROUND WATER DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT CIRCLE, KALABURGI. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION AND GROUND WATER DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT DIVISION, KOPPAL. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSYE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHNG THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 15.12.2017 BEARING NO.A IM/SNI.MA.AM.VRU/KA/TAM/S-02/SAIM- VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.19 10:32:31 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3200 WP No. 100385 of 2018 3/2017-18/3491 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-K. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF INDENT NO.12391, 12394, 12390, 12393 AND 12295 AFRESH FOR TECHNICAL BID BY CONSIDERING REPRESENTATION AT ANNEXURE-L AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petition has rendered infructuous by efflux of time. The submission is placed on record. The petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NAA/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 153