APHC010083062002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25400/2002 Between: 1. BALAJI INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD.,, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER A.V.BALARAMA REDDY, S/O. GOPALA KRISHNA, CHEMUDUGUNTA, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, 2. ARJUN TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED,, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, K.V.KRISHNAIAH, S/O. SREERAMULU R/O. FLAT NO.15, R.K.TOWERS, SOMASEKHARA PURAM, ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. LABOUR COURT, REP. BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER, GUNTUR. 2. THE GENERAL SECRETARY, BALAJI INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD., (STEEL DIVISION) EMPLOYEES UNION, REGN.NO. 2039, CHEMUDUGUNTA, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Prohibition for bearing the 1st Respondent from proceeding with E.P.No.19/2001 pending on its file and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 32078 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.19/2001 pending on the file of the 1st Respondent herein pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 3905 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in W.P.M.P.No.32078 of 2002 in W.P.No.25400 of 2002 dt 26-12-2002 and dismiss the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 24273 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Registry to post the Writ Petition on OUT OF TURN of hearing and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P GOVINDA RAJULU 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 28.08.2025, 31.07.2025 and 07.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 197 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:25400 of 2002 Date: 25.09.2025 MP