Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45845 (AP)

M/s JMC Constructions Pvt. Ltd., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16621/2025 · 2025-09-23

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010326672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16621/2025 Between: 1. M/S JMC CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,, REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY S.KAMAL BASHA S/O S.AIII, AGE 53 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O H.NO.27-972/1, TELECOM COLONY, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE ENGINEERIN CHIEF, (R AND B), ADMN AND NDB., VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (R AND B) CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (R AND B) DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri.K.V.L.Narasimha Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings. 2. Sri. Sk. Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 has submitted a Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, (R&B) Division, Chittoor, dated 22.09.2025 and a copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the same is taken on record. Along with the Written Instructions, he also furnished a photocopy of the bills status report which indicates that the amount of Rs.49,92,002/- had been paid to the Petitioner. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the opinion that the relief sought by the Petitioner has been redressed by the Respondents. 4. In this view of the matter, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:24.09.2025 RSD 3 95 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16621/2025 Dt:24.09.2025 RSD