Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45840 (CHH)

KU. KALYANI MUKHERJEE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/34/2020 · 2025-08-12

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40768 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 34 of 2020 1 - Ku. Kalyani Mukherjee D/o Late Shri Bhavanishankar Mukherjee Aged About 68 Years R/o Civil Lines, Bengalipara, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Controlling Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972 And Assistant Labour Commissioner Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council, Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.14 18:02:18 +0530 2 Order on Board 13/08/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 would submit that in compliance of RRC (Annexure P/3) dated 27.11.2017 issued by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972-cum-Assistant Labour Commissioner, District Raigarh, payment of interest from 29.07.2016 till 28.04.2022, amounting to Rs.1,98,803/- has been paid vide letter dated 28.04.2022 issued by respondent No.5, thus, interest of 5 years and 9 months i.e. for the period of total 69 months has been paid. He further submit that total amount of Rs.4,41,117/- has been paid to the petitioner vide communication dated 14.08.2023 sent by Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kharsiya to the Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Branch Kharsiya. He further submit that relief(s) sought for by the petitioner has been complied with. 2. The aforesaid fact has not been objected by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. In view of above contention made by the counsel for respondent No.5, this petitioner is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi