Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45832 (KAR)

SRI GANGADHAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/27105/2024 · 2025-02-27

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8499 WP No. 27105 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 27105 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI GANGADHAR S/O. JAVANEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUBARA BEEDI, KADAKOLA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-571 311. 2. SRI. VISHAKANTHA S/O. JAVANEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUBARA BEEDI, KADAKOLA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-571 311. 3. SMT. RAJAMAMMA W/O. AIYYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT KURUBARA BEEDI, KADAKOLA VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-571 311. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S KALYAN BASAVARAJ., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8499 WP No. 27105 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 8J4V V8V, JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURA, CHAMARAJAPURAM MOHALLA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSURU, KARNATAKA-570 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R-1; SRI. T.P.VIVEKANANDA., ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION IN ANNEXURE-R DATED 27.06.2024 FOR ISSUANCE OF SINGLE LAYOUT PLAN IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8499 WP No. 27105 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that this writ petition has become infructuous and he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 95