IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 123 M/S SHAKTIMAN CEMENTS LIMITED AND OTHERS STATE BANK OF INDIA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have (Annexure P-11) whereby the property of the petitioners is being put to auction on 16.04.2025. On advance notice, Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent and submits that the imp being withdrawn In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed at this stage. The petition is disposed of 09.04.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CWP-10570-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 09.04.2025 M/S SHAKTIMAN CEMENTS LIMITED AND OTHERS Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for Mr. Aalok Jagga, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have challenged the sale notice dated 04.03.2025 11) whereby the property of the petitioners is being put to auction On advance notice, Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent and submits that the imp being withdrawn due to clerical errors. In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioners stands at this stage. The petition is disposed of as infructuous (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 09.04.2025 M/S SHAKTIMAN CEMENTS LIMITED AND OTHERS … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA for the petitioner(s). Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate for the respondent. challenged the sale notice dated 04.03.2025 11) whereby the property of the petitioners is being put to auction On advance notice, Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent and submits that the impugned sale notice is In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioners stands as infructuous. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No challenged the sale notice dated 04.03.2025 11) whereby the property of the petitioners is being put to auction On advance notice, Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate puts in ugned sale notice is In view of the above, the grievance of the petitioners stands SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.04.09 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document