Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45826 (CAL)

SADEK MOLLA @ CHADEK ALI MOLLA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

CRR/4813/2024 · 2025-08-18

Bibhas Ranjan De

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. 07 Ct 32 rup 18.08. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 4813 of 2024 Sadek Molla @ Chadek Ali Molla Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya, Mr. Priyam Mishra, Mr. Bidyut Kumar Bhattacharya. … for the petitioner. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the instant revisional application has been filed assailing an order passed under PWDV Act not in compliance with Section 29 of the Act. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has prayed for withdrawal of this revisional application with prayer to file afresh in compliance with the provision of Section 29 of the Act. 3. Thus, the revisional application stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Liberty is given to the petitioner to file afresh in compliance with the provision of Section 29 of the Act before the appropriate forum. 5. Original certified copy be return by replacing photocopy of the same. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2