Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45821 (ALL)

SHARAFAT HUSAIN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12347/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61526-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No.33) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12347 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sharafat Husain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Yadav,Vivek Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tejasvi Misra Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. As per paragraph-6 of the writ petition, the alleged threat of demolition is by the officers of Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad. However, Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad has not been impleaded as respondent but instead of this, the petitioner has chosen to file the writ petition against UPSIDC and the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA). 2. Sri Tejasvi Mishra, learned counsel appearing for GDA states that the GDA has no concern with the matter, as the alleged threat of demolition is not by GDA but by Nagar Nigam, which is not impleaded as respondent. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner file a fresh petition after impleading proper parties. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Ashish Pd. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad