Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4582 (HP)

Sahil Yadav v. Radha

CMP.M/57/2025 · 2025-03-21

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sahil Yadav Vs. Radha CMP(M) No.57 of 2025 21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Digvijay Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Varun Thakur, Mr. Akash Thakur and Mr. Aditya Chauhan, Advocates, for the respondent. Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the applicant, we find sufficient cause having been carved out by the applicant which prevented him from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, delay of 71 days’ in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO (FC) No.____ of 2025 Appeal be registered. Since the present appeal emanates out of a matrimonial discord, it is incumbent upon this Court to make an endeavor to resolve the same amicably. Therefore, let both the parties appear before this Court on the next date of hearing so as to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. List on 25.03.2025. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) March 21, 2025 Judge (VH)