1 2025:CGHC:1634-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 97 of 2025 1 - Johan Lal Ghosle S/o Late Shri Ruprai Ghosle Aged About 61 Years Present Address Vikas Nagar 27 Kholi Police Station Civil Line District Bilaspur (C.G.) Permanent Address Village Mohtara Police Station Masturi District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Babita Banjare W/o Shri Shivhendra Banjare Aged About 29 Years R/o Rodhindih Police Station Ramgarh District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.) 3 - Sarita Ghosle W/o Shri Digvijay Ghosle Aged About 36 Years R/o Mohatara Police Station Masturi District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Trisal Ghosle S/o Shri Johan Lal Ghosle Aged About 23 Years Permanent Address Village Mohatara Police Station Masturi District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Present Address Vikas Nagar 27, Kholi Police Station Civil Line District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Civil Line District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Same Lal Burman S/o Bahorik Lal Burman Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Rivapar Police Station Shivarinarayan District - Janjgir - Chamap (C.G.) ...Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.10 17:53:19 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 10.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “i) quash/set aside the FIR of Crime No.925/2024 u/s 306 R/w 34 of IPC registered against the petitioner in police Station Civil Lines, District Bilaspur (C.G.) (Annexure P/3). ii) or any other relief as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscious.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the present CRMP has been filed for quashing of the FIR, but in the present case, investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted in the Court concerned and he prays that the present petition be dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file the same challenging the charge-sheet. 4. Learned State counsel and learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.1, has no objection. 3 5. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 6. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging the charge- sheet before the appropriate forum, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu