APHC010498942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26177 OF 2025 Between: 1. S AHMED HUSSAIN, S/o. S. Hussain Saheb, Aged about 60 years, R/o. Plot no. 155 and 156 Santosh Nagar, Kurrool. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Heme Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Director General of Police, Amaravati, Guntur District 3. The Superintendent of Police, KURNOOL. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, IV KURNOOL. 5. Iqbal, S/o not known. Aged about 52 years. President of Awaz committee, (CPI/I party). Near Masumbasha Dargha, Old Town, Kurnool. 6. M Abdul Sattar, S/c M. Allabakash, Aged about 54 years, Plot No. 140, H.No. 3-149, Santhosh Nagar, Kurnool. 7. S Meera Mohiddin, Rtd Poli R/c Plot No. 271, Santhosh Nagar, Kurnool. 8. S Yunus, S. Yunus, S/o Shaik Basheer Ahamed, Aged about 53 years. Plot no. 3-131-2, Santhosh Nagar Kurnool. 9. Mohammad Shafi Ahamad, S/c. Mohammad Noor Ahama years. Lorry owner, R/o H.No. 3 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26177 OF 2025 1. S AHMED HUSSAIN, S/o. S. Hussain Saheb, Aged about 60 years, R/o. Plot no. 155 and 156 Santosh Nagar, Kurrool. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary ecretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The Director General of Police, Amaravati, Guntur District 3. The Superintendent of Police, KURNOOL. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, IV-Town Police Station, Ballary Chowrastha, Aged about 52 years. President of Awaz committee, (CPI/I party). Near Masumbasha Dargha, Old Town, Kurnool. 6. M Abdul Sattar, S/c M. Allabakash, Aged about 54 years, Plot No. 140, 149, Santhosh Nagar, Kurnool. 7. S Meera Mohiddin, Rtd Police S/c, Khaja Hussain, Aged about 60 years, R/c Plot No. 271, Santhosh Nagar, Kurnool. 8. S Yunus, S. Yunus, S/o Shaik Basheer Ahamed, Aged about 53 years. 2, Santhosh Nagar Kurnool. 9. Mohammad Shafi Ahamad, S/c. Mohammad Noor Ahamad, Aged about 52 years. Lorry owner, R/o H.No. 3-154/2, Santosh Nagar Kurnool. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. S AHMED HUSSAIN, S/o. S. Hussain Saheb, Aged about 60 years, R/o. ...Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Town Police Station, Ballary Chowrastha, Aged about 52 years. President of Awaz committee, 6. M Abdul Sattar, S/c M. Allabakash, Aged about 54 years, Plot No. 140, ce S/c, Khaja Hussain, Aged about 60 years, 8. S Yunus, S. Yunus, S/o Shaik Basheer Ahamed, Aged about 53 years. d, Aged about 52 2 10. S Karim, S/o Mohammad Shafi Ahamad, Aged about 30 years, R/o. .i.No. 3-154/2, Santosh Nagar, Kurnool. 11. Katika Razak, S/o Katika Salam, Agt 1 about 45 years, Noo- Matanand chicken shop Ne Mahindra showroom, Santosh Nagar, Kurnool. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes and Madrasa-e- Noorti Huda Mosque and Madras with the respondents 5 to 11 as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents 5 to 11 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased eased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and Madrasa-e-Noorul Huda Mosque and Madras by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents 5 toll and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: G SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26177 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes and Madrasa-e- Noorti Huda Mosque and Madras with the respondents 5 to 11 as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes by calling the petitioner to the police station and pressuring the petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the respondents 5 to 11 and pass....…” 2. Heard Sri G.Sravan Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner calling to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the civil disputes and Madrasa-e-Noorul Huda Mosque and Madras with the respondent Nos.5 to 11 are they trying to interfere in the civil suit vide O.S.No.89/2023 on the file of III Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the police not to interfere in civil dispute. In case any crime, if any, is 4 registered against the petitioner by this time, the police are directed to follow due process of law to secure the presence of the petitioner before the police. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 25.09.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26177 of 2025 Dated: 25.09.2025 KKV