Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45810 (RAJ)

SURENDRA MITTAL SON OF SHRI KAILASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/188/2024 · 2025-12-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51105] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 188/2024 Surendra Mittal Son of Shri Kailash Chand, Resident of 82, Mangal Vihar, Gopalpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. 2. Deendayal Agarwal Son of Shri Ganpatlal Agarwal, Resident of Village Phalodi Quarize, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Ds Bansal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Pankaj Agarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/12/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.PC, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.425/2014 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur (South) (Rajasthan), for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC on the basis of compromise. 2. Petitioner and complainant are present in person and they have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. [2025:RJ-JP:51105] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-188/2024] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor places factual report dated 22.01.2025 received from the SHO, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur South. According to which, negative final report has been submitted in this matter in the concerned Court on 21.10.2020. The said report is taken on record. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. He submits that in respect of compromise, complainant has also filed an application before the concerned police station on 19.01.2025. 6. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably, as also the fact that negative final report has been submitted in this matter and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.425/2014 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur (South) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. [2025:RJ-JP:51105] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-188/2024] 8. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /22