MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/25081/2021 · 2025-10-14
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45807 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45807 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010409272021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25081/2021 Between:
MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 470(OLD)/W638A(NEW) MANAPPURAM HOUSE, VALAPAD, THRISSUR, KERALA - 680 567 REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. VINAY SINGH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.,
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THE DGP OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S.SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA.,
4. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CCS-II, VIJAYAWADA CITY, A.P.
5. VANDRAPU VENKATA LAVANYA KUMARI, , W/O. DURGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 29 YRS, R/O.9-56-34, APPALA SWAMY STREET, PANJA CENTER, MAHANTHI PURAM, VIJAYAWADA
6. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REP BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, RESERVE BANK BUILDINGS, CENTRAL 1, 12 AND 13 FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGHAT SINGH MARG, MUMBAI - 4
7. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOPALA RAO AMANCHARLA V Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. HARINATH N (Asst Solicitor General)
2
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus by calling records, declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 and 4 in issuing letter dt.11.10.2021 as illegal, void, arbitrary, null, ultravires and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 to not to interfere with the day to day business activities of the petitioner.”
2. None represented for the Petitioner.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.10.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.25081 of 2021
Dt.15.10.2025
Dinesh