Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45800 (AP)

TatasSubbarao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10872/2020 · 2025-09-22

B Krishna Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010111812022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10872/2022 Between: 1. N GOVINDA RAJU, S/O LATE GURUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, MANDAL SURVEYOR, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, ADDATEEGALA, R/O ADDATEEGALA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS, ROAD NO. 7-104, B BLOCK, 4TH FLOOR, NTTPS ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, AMARAVATHI, VIJAYAWADA 3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, R AND B QUARTERS, GUNTUR 4. HINDU COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL, GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the Charge Memo No. REV-18023/15/2018-VIG III-REV, dt. 19.04.2018 with unconscionable delay as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of Indiaand set aside the same with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Charge Memo No. REV- 18023/15/2018-VIG III-REV dt. 19.04.2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SRIKANTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land for an extent of Ac.2.76 cents in Sy.No.505/1 of Patha Cheerala Village, Chirala Revenue Village and Mandal of Prakasam District for the allotment of house site pattas to the weaker section people under the ‘Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu’ scheme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.09.2025 submits that the subject land is classified as assessed waste land, it is not under cultivation and it is not used for the above said public purpose housing scheme. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.09.2025 shall be made as part of the court record. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 NNN