IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4570 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2024 Thana- DAWATH District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Son of Dinanath Ram Resident of Village - Jagodhra, P.S.- Dawath (Kachhwa), District - Rohtas. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Ravish Kumar Son of Nagendra Paswan @ Nagendra Kumar Resident of Village - Jagodhra, P.S.- Dawath, District - Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan For the Informant : Ms. Ojaswee Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 02-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by learned Special Court, SC/ST Act, Sasaram, Rohtas whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Dawath P.S. Case No. 408 of 2024 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, later on Section 103(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 was added, read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(2)(v), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act was rejected. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the appellant along with other co-accused person allegedly shot informant’s Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4570 of 2025(4) dt.02-04-2026 2/2 brother in the stomach. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The appellant is in custody since 15.04.2025. 5. Learned Special P.P. for the State and the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant and have submitted that the appellant is the main assailant of the deceased. . 6. Considering the fact that appellant is the main assailant of the deceased, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the appellant. 7. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U