VIVEK @ RAMLAKHAN @ VISHNU S/O RAMVILAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14527/2025 · 2025-11-07
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45797 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45797 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44716] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13950/2025
1. Rahul S/o Rakesh, R/o Naurangabad Police Station Kolari District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Baadi District Dholpur)
2. Jogesh S/o Prithviraj, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chande Ka Pura, Chitora, Police Station Kolari, District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Baadi District Dholpur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14527/2025 Vivek @ Ramlakhan @ Vishnu S/o Ramvilas, R/o Bandapura Tasimo Police Station Sepau District Dholpur. At Present Confined In Judicial Custody At District Jail Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Jatav Mr. Sachhin Kumar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 07/11/2025
1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused- applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 226/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:44716] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13950/2025] registered at Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 309(4) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submit that the applicants are bread earner of their families. The matter is triable by Magistrate and applicants are in custody ever since
21.09.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants behind bars till disposal of the case.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicants.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicants are bread earner of their families; that the matter is triable my Magistrate; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail applications of the accused-applicants and enlarge them on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants 1. Rahul S/o Rakesh, 2. Jogesh S/o Prithviraj and 3. Vivek @ Ramlakhan @ Vishnu S/o Ramvilas shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
[2025:RJ-JP:44716] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13950/2025]
6. Considering the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicants, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicants to periodically mark attendance at the concerned Police Station once on every 5th of the month. Furthermore, it is directed that the accused-applicants shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /160-161