BHUPENDRA S/O SHRI RATTIRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18767/2025 · 2025-12-04
Anuroop Singhi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45796 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45796 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18767/2025
1. Bhupendra S/o Shri Rattiram, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Kherli, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 2. Deepak Prajapat S/o Shri Laxmanarayan, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Dinesh Tanwar S/o Shri Ravindra Tanwar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Rehan Khan Manehar S/o Bundu Khan, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Aamer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Golu Saini S/o Shri Roop Singh Saini, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Muhana, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 6. Heeralal S/o Shri Suresh Kumar, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 7. Hemraj Prajapat S/o Shri Rameshwar Prajapat, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Alampur, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 8. Kajal Gurjar D/o Shri Ramkesh Gurjar, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Kothkhawda, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Khem Singh Awana S/o Shri Ratti Ram Gurjar, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 10. Lalaram Prajapat S/o Shri Hari Narayan Prajapat, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Dkhiya, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 11. Mohit Kumar Sain S/o Shri Mukesh Kumar Sain, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Vpo Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 12. Naitik Rao S/o Rajesh Ram Thukaran, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 13. Praveen Prajapat S/o Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 14. Raj Saini S/o Shri Ramprasad Saini, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Budana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 15. Reena D/o Ummed Singh, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Doomra, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:49327] (2 of 3) [CW-18767/2025]
16. Ritika Meena D/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Aamer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 17. Sachin Kumar S/o Shri Shyam Singh, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Jagariya Khura, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 18. Tushar Dhakar S/o Shri Rameshwar Dhakar, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 19. Uamshankar Prajapat S/o Shri Pappuram Prajapat, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Kumhar Mohalla, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 20. Vansh Jangid S/o Shri Vishan Dayal Jangid, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Alwar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 21. Zahid Khan S/o Shri Mohammed Zakir Khan, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Jodhpur, District Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principle Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt.
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Jaipur Through Its Registrar, Sector-18 Pratap Nagar Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar, B-39 Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Controller Of Examination, Rajasthan University Of Health Science, Jaipur, Sector-18 Kumbha Marg, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 5. NIMT College Of Nursing, Jaipur, Through Its President, Address- Nimt College Of Nursing, 1-4, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Bagrana, Post Kanota, Agra Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj with Mr. Brijesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.A. Khan with Ms. Shama Khan Mr. Yash Joshi with Mr. Priyam Agarwal for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG
[2025:RJ-JP:49327] (3 of 3) [CW-18767/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 04/12/2025 Considering the fact that a writ petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21576/2025 has already been filed by the respondent No.5 NIMT College of Nursing, Jaipur before the Principal seat, Jodhpur arising out of the very same controversy and the same is pending consideration, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. However, it would be in the fitness of things to dispose of the present writ petition with liberty to respondents to file an appropriate application in the said pending writ petition or file a writ petition afresh at Principal seat, Jodhpur, if so advised. In view of above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIKSHA MISHRA /73