Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.31 OF 2022
BETWEEN
SRI. DODDADINNE CHANDREGOWDA S/O LATE LAKSHMANGOWDA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT KUDUGARAHALLI SAKALESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT. ...Appellant (Sriyuths: Shivaswamy, G.L.Renukaprasad, Advocates for Appellant)
AND
1.
SMT. LAKSHMI
W/O LATE ANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
2. PREETHIKA
D/O LATE ANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
3. RADHIKA
D/O LATE ANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
4 VIJETH S/O LATE ANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS
MFA.No.31/2022 ---------------------
2 RESPONDENT NO.4 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT. LAXMI W/O LATE ANNAPPA, THE RESPONDENT NO.1 HEREIN.
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 4 RESIDENTS OF KATEHALLI VILLAGE HALASULIGE POST, SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
5. HEMA
W/O LATE THAMBI
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/AT KUDUGARAHALLI VILLAGE, SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
6. BINDU
D/O LATE THAMBI
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
R/AT KUDUGARAHALLI VILLAGE SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
7. ANANDA
S/O LATE THAMBI
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
R/AT KUDUGARAHALLI VILLAGE SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
8. B.N.SHASHIREKHA
W/O B.SHANTHARAJU
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, HALASULIGE POST SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
9. MANJULA
W/O KRISHNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
MFA.No.31/2022 ---------------------
3
R/AT BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, HALASULIGE POST SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT.
……..Respondents
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 30(1) Employee Compensation Act against the Judgment and Award dated 23.07.2021 passed in E.C.A. No.31/2014 on the file of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Senior Civil Judge, Sakaleshpura, awarding compensation of Rs.7,01,717/- with interest at 9 percent per annum from one month next after the date of injury of the Deceased.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the appellant.
Two weeks time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the above appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court.
Sd/- JUDGE
MFA.No.31/2022 ---------------------
4 NOTE: Vide Court Order dated.20.01.2025 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : VL C By : YL