- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48836 WP No. 31118 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31118 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT YASHODHA W/O MAHABALA PUJARY. AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. R/AT ANKARODI HOUSE. ULI VILLAGE AND POST. BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 326 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. M.S. BUILDING. DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI. BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER. STATE BANK ROAD, OPP: STATE BANK OF INDIA. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. MANGALURU-575 001 Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48836 WP No. 31118 of 2025 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION. ATTAVARA, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALURU-575 001 4. THE THASILDAR. BANTWAL TALUK. TALUKA OFFICE, B.C. ROAD. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 219. 5. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER. ULI GRAMA PANCHAYAT. BANTWAL TALUK. DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-574 326. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SRI RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR R5) *** THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 25.03.2025 PASSED ON I.A. NO. VIII IN REVENUE APPEAL NO. 447/2021 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU VACATING THE INTERIM ORDER OF STAY GRANTED ON 15.12.2021 WHICH WAS EXTENDED UNTIL FURTHER ORDERS ON 01.12.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48836 WP No. 31118 of 2025 ORAL ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 25.03.2025 passed on I.A.No.VIII in Revenue Appeal No.447/2021 passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal ['KAT'], Bengaluru. By virtue of the said order, the interim order granted on 15.12.2021 came to be vacated. 2. After hearing the matter for some time, noticing that the said Revenue Appeal is pending consideration, any order passed regarding the correctness of the order passed on I.A.No.VIII would have the effect of making certain observations which may prejudice the proceedings before the KAT which is hearing the main appeal. 3. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to direct the KAT to dispose of the main appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR