Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8718 WP No. 20809 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 20809 OF 2023 (BDA) BETWEEN:
SRI. S DATTATREYA RAO S/O S SUBRAMANYA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.21, 21/A, 1ST MAIN, 5TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI, VIJAYANGARA, BANGALORE - 560 040.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEENNANDA D T.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIYA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 020.
2.
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI ROAD, BANGALORE - 500 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. KRISHNA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SMT. B.SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO ALLOT ALTERNATIVE SITE
Digitally signed by ROOPA R U Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8718 WP No. 20809 of 2023
TO THE PETITIONER BY THE R-1; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION ANNEXED AS ANNX-G OF THE PETITIONER DATED 07.03.2022 AND ALLOT ALTERNATIVE SITE TO THE PETITIONER IN ARKAVATI LAYOUT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner is before this Court seeking issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondent -BDA to consider the application dated 07.03.2022 of the petitioner as per Annexure- G for allotment of alternate site in Arkavathi Layout.
2. Case of the petitioner is that he was allotted a site bearing No.1277 measuring 6 meters X 9 meters in Arkavathi Layout 11th Block as per allotment letter dated 30.12.2005. A lease-cum-sale agreement dated 07.01.2011 was executed. Possession and Katha certificates were also issued. That the land in which the said site forming part of was denotified. As such, the petitioner made a representation on 07.03.2022 as per Annexure-G seeking allotment of alternate site. Since there has been no action on the part of the respondent -BDA in this regard, petitioner is before this Court.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8718 WP No. 20809 of 2023
3. Counsel for the respondent -BDA submit given some time and on petitioner satisfying all requirements of the respondent-BDA, case of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law.
4. Submission is taken on record.
5. Hence, the following;
ORDER
1. Petition is disposed of.
2. The respondent-BDA shall consider the representation dated 07.03.2022 produced at Annexure-G of the petitioner after giving an opportunity of personal hearing and if the petitioner is found eligible appropriate orders shall be passed in accordance with law.
3. Such orders shall be passed within an outer limit of four (4) months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 60