Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.02.2025 Serial no.87 list dt.12.1.2025 Or Supp. List- 39) [Dd] (Bail Rejected) CRM (DB) 3767 of 2024 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliyaganj Police Station Case No. 539 of 2023 dated 24.12.2023 under Sections 302/201/120B IPC subsequently charge sheet filed under Sections 302/201/120B of the IPC. -And- In the matter of : Amal Sarkar … …Petitioner Mr. Pronjojit Roy, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Ms. Amita Gaur, sr. adv. Md. Yaser A. Ismail,Advocate … …For the State Mr. Amir Roy, Advocate .. …For the de facto complainant
1. Petitioner renews the prayer for bail.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody in excess of 1 year 2 months. Charges are yet to be framed.
3. State and the de facto complainant are represented.
4. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the defence is taking time and, therefore, the charges could not be framed. Moreover, an application for cancellation of the bail granted to a co-accused is pending.
5. Pendency of the application for cancellation of the bail granted, should not inhibit, in our view, the framing of charges.
6. Learned trial Court is requested to frame charges as expeditiously as possible.
7. Petitioner stands implicated in a crime of murder. Apparently, the victim was electrocuted and the body of the Signed By : DEBABRATA DAS High Court of Calcutta 14 th of February 2025 01:41:11 PM
2 victim was dumped in the field. Active role in such incident is attributed to the petitioner.
8. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
9. Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
10. CRM (DB) 3767 of 2024 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) Signed By : DEBABRATA DAS High Court of Calcutta 14 th of February 2025 01:41:11 PM