The Water User Association No. 12, v. Sri Shamsher Singh Rawat,
CC/245/2024 · 2025-09-11
R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45776 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45776 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010658882023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 245/2024 Between:
1. THE WATER USER ASSOCIATION NO. 12,, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT OF ANNAPUREDDY SIVA RAMI REDDY, S/O. MAHANANDI REDDY, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 3/54, MADDURU, PANYAM, KUMOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. SRI SASIBHUSHAN KUMAR, 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,. IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
3. SRI DR G SRIJANA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KUMOOL, KUMOOL DISTRICT.
4. SRI S KABHIR BASHA, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SRBC CIRCLE NO. IV, NANDYAL, KUMOOL DISTRICT.
5. SRI P SUBHA KUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SRBC DIVISION NO. IV, GOMKALLU @ NANDYAL, KUMOOL DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
be pleased to pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to Punish them for violating the orders 26.09.2022 Passed in W.P No. 27327of 2022 by Honble Sri Justice Sri R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Order dispense with the filing of the Certified Copy of the Order dated 26.09.2022Passed in W.P No. 27327 of 2022 and to Pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
2. The Court made the following order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of the Court have been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
12.09.2025 MJA
529
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 245 of 2024
12.09.2025
MJA