IMRAT MOR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/20784/2019 · 2025-03-26
Kirti Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45773 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45773 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-20784-2019 Decided on : 26.03.2025 Imrat Mor and others . . . Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Parveen Moudgil, Advocate for Ms. Sunita Nain, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG Haryana Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate and Mr. Yuwan Singla, Advocate for respondent No. 2 **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)
1. At the very outset, learned State counsel on instructions submits that the prosecution witnesses have been examined and the case is now fixed for defence evidence.
2. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE March 26, 2025 reena Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No REENA 2025.03.26 06:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh