Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45772 (ORI)

PRATIKSHYA SWAIN v. ANSHUMAN PATNAIK

WP(C)/15892/2019 · 2025-09-04

Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.15892 of 2019 Pratikshya Swain …. Petitioner Ms. S. Biswal, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate -versus- Anshuman Patnaik …. Opposite Party Ms. K. Banerjee, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Mr. A.K. Otta, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 04.09.2025 04. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned Proxy Counsel for the parties are present. 3. It is submitted at the Bar that, during pendency of the present writ petition so also the connected matter on board, the parties have mutually divorced and the prayer made in both the writ petitions have become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Kanhu (S. K. MISHRA) JUDGE Designation: Junior Stenographer Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.