Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45771 (ALL)

NITIN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/54855/2013 · 2025-09-14

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 54855 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 15, 2025 SP/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Shekhar Kushwaha, Lallan Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dr. H.N Tripathi, Irshad Husain, Sanjeev Singh (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Nitin And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad