Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45759 (AP)

KALIDINDI LAVANYA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/25003/2025 · 2025-09-15

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25003/2025 Between: 1. KALIDINDI LAVANYA, W/O KALIDINDI VARMA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O 7-2-26/1, KODETI VARI STREET, NARASAYYA AGRAHAARAM, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , BHIMAVARAM I POLICE STATION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondent 2 to 4 to produce the detainee i.e., Kalidindi Mohan Siva Krishna Varama, S/o Kalidindi Varma, Aged about 18 years, R/o 7-2-26/1, Kodeti vari Street, Narasayya Agrahaaram, Bhimavaram, West Godavari District, from the illegal custody of 4th respondent, before the Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the 2 to 4 respondents to initiate action against 4th Respondent, for the illegal detention of the detainees and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has been set at liberty. 2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the detenue had only been summoned to the Police Station, for service of notice under Section 35 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. 3. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J _______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J Date: 16.09.2025 MJA 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25003/2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 16.09.2025 MJA