UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CW/16350/2025 · 2025-11-04
Ashutosh Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45752 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45752 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44256] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16350/2025
1. Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Ltd., Having Its Registered Office And Head Office At Grape Garden No. 27, 3Rd A Cross, 18Th Main, 6Th Block, Koramangala, Bengaluru- 560095 And Branch Office At Plot No. A-58A And A-59, Ground Floor, Scheme No. 10- A, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur-302017 Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney Sh. Yash Bhargava, Authorised Signatory/area Manager- Legal Recovery At Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Regional Office, 2Nd Floor, GMTT Building, Plot No. D-7 Sector 3 Noida (Up)-201301.
2. Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Ltd., Through Its Authorised Signatory/area Manager- Legal Recovery, Sonkhar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. District Collector, Office Of District Magistrate, Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Respondent
2. Mubarik @ Mubarik Khan S/o Samashudin @ Samsuddin, R/o Baldeobas, Jai Shri, Bharatpur, Rajasthan - 321024 Also At Ward No. 7, Baldevbas, Tehsil Sikri, Bharatpur, Rajasthan - 321024 (Borrower)
3. Aliman W/o Mubarik @ Mubarik Khan, R/o Baldeobas, Jai Shri, Bharatpur, Rajasthan - 321024 (Co-Borrower/ Guarantor) ----Proforma Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Choudhary, Adv. with Mr. Yadvendra Patel, Adv. on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 04/11/2025
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers:-
[2025:RJ-JP:44256] (2 of 3) [CW-16350/2025]
"In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to accept this writ petition and, i. By appropriate writ, order and direction, Respondent
District
Collector/
District Magistrate may be directed to adjudicate applications No 26/2025 filed by the Petitioner Bank U/S 14 of the Act of 2002, within time bound manner as prescribed U/S 14 of the Act of 2002. ii. By appropriate writ, order and direction, the Respondent may further be directed to adjudicate applications U/S 14 of the Act of 2002, as mentioned in Para 10 of the writ petition, in accordance with the provisions of Section 14 of the Act of 2002. iii. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on 15.07.2025, the petitioners filed an application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2002') before the respondent No.1-District Collector, Deeg. Learned counsel further submits that as per the mandate of Section 14 of the Act of 2002, the same should have been decided by the respondent No.1- District Collector, Deeg at the most, within a period of 60 days, however, the same is still pending.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1- District Collector, Deeg to decide the application filed by the
[2025:RJ-JP:44256] (3 of 3) [CW-16350/2025] petitioner under Section 14 of the Act of 2002 in a time bound manner.
4. Mr. Manoj Choudhary, Adv. puts in appearance on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.1.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.
6. In view of the aforesaid discussions, the present petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1-District Collector, Deeg to decide the pending application preferred by the petitioners on 15.07.2025, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall be at liberty to file separate writ petitions qua the other applications filed and are stated to be pending before the respondent No.1-District Collector, Deeg in the similar circumstances.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /22