CWP-29816-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 136 CWP-29816-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 23.03.2026 BIMLA AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddarth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Priyanka, Advocate for Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Senior counsel states that petitioners are in possession of 2 kanals – 10 marlas of land in the revenue estate of Patiala and by vitrue of notification dated 01.04.2020 being an occupant, he is entitled to purchase it. Senior counsel submits that the petitioner has submitted a request dated 01.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) to the official respondents for conferring the proprietory/ownership rights but application is still pending. 2. An advance copy of the petition has been served upon the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Counsel for respondent No.5 does not have any instructions regarding the pendency of representation (Annexure P-7). KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.01 09.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-29816-2025 2 4. This petition is supported with an affidavit of the petitioner. Representation given by the petitioners seems to be pending and has to be decided one way or the other. 5. In view thereof, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the representation (Annexure P-7) as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 23.03.2026 sapna Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.04.01 09.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document