Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45743 (ALL)

DEENA NATH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/31101/2021 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31101 of 2021 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 9, 2025 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jai Krishna Tiwari (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Deena Nath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad