Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45741 (RAJ)

DHATTARWAL ANIMAL HUSBANDRY v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/4937/2018 · 2025-10-29

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43361] (1 of 2) [CW-4937/2018] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4937/2018 Dhattarwal Animal Husbandry Diploma College, Hamirwas Lamba Run And Managed By Dhattarwal Education, R/o Village Lamba Mandrella, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Dy. Secretary To The Govt. Department Of Animal Husbandry, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Sciences, Bikaner, Through Its Registrar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Punit Singhvi with Ms. Shraddha Mehta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG Mr. Sandeep Pathak Ms. Stuti Dave Mr. Manik Kaswan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/10/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner-college submits that certain other colleges have been granted No Objection Certificate (‘NOC’) by the respondents, and petitioner- college stands on a similar footing, possessing all requisite qualifications as per the policy issued by the respondents in the year 2020. It is, therefore, submitted that the respondents may be directed to consider petitioner’s case for grant of NOC in light of the same policy. [2025:RJ-JP:43361] (2 of 2) [CW-4937/2018] Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection and submits that, in case any representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered in accordance with the applicable rules and policy issued in the year 2020. In view of above, this court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with a direction that petitioner would be at liberty to submit a comprehensive representation raising his grievance before the respondents within a period of four weeks from today along with certified copy of this order. If any such representation is submitted by the petitioner along with certified copy of this order within a period of four weeks, respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by way of passing a reasoned/speaking order, strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and policy of 2020, within a period of two months from the date of submission of the representation. The respondents are further directed to duly intimate the petitioner regarding the outcome of the said representation. This Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, if any representation is filed by the petitioner, same may be decided without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. Stay application and pending application(s), (if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /26