Vinay Krishna Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
CWJC/21479/2018 · 2025-07-02
Alok Kumar Sinha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45741 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45741 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21479 of 2018 ====================================================== Vinay Krishna Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh S/O Late Ram Nandan Singh, Resident of Vilalge Ashok Nagar Pokharia, P.S. Town, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through Nagar Vikash Secretary Bihar, Patna.
2. The Nagar Aayukta, Nagar Nigam, Begusarai, District- Begusarai.
3. The Upper Nagar Aayukta, Nagar Nigam, Begusarai, District- Begusarai.
4. The District Magistrate, Begusarai.
5. The Exectuive Officer, nagar Parishad, begusarai Municipality, District- Begusarai.
6. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.
7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Begusarai.
8. The S.H.O. Begusarai, Town P.S. District- Begusara.
9. Ajay Shanker Singh S/O Late Ram Balak Singh, Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S. Muffasil, District- Begusarai, At present Ashok Nagar, Pokharia, Ward No. 30, P.S. Town, District- Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Yogendra Pd. Sinha, Adv. For Respondent No.9 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr Ashok Kumar, Advocates. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 8 02-07-2025 No one appears for the petitioner while learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for Municipal Corporation, Begusarai and that of Respondent No.9 are present.
2. On the previous occasion i.e., 14.05.2025 also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It was made clear that if the petitioner will not appear on the next date, the Court
Patna High Court CWJC No.21479 of 2018(8) dt.02-07-2025 2/2 may consider for dismissing the writ application for non prosecution. Today again, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this writ application.
3. Under these circumstances, the present writ application is dismissed for non prosecution.
perwez (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U