BHARATKUNWAR @ BHARATI D/O TEJSINH AHADA (DARBAR) v. STATE OF GUJARAT
SCR.A/9384/2025 · 2025-07-18
Hasmukh D Suthar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4574 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4574 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
R/SCR.A/9384/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/07/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 9384 of 2025 ========================================================== BHARATKUNWAR @ BHARATI D/O TEJSINH AHADA (DARBAR) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR MAHESHKUMAR K DAVE(17227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 18/07/2025 ORAL ORDER [1.0] By way of present petition, the petitioner prays for direction directing the Respondent authorities to lodge the FIR pursuant to the representation dated 11.06.2025 (Annexure-A). [2.0] Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has approached respondent authority by way of representation dated 11.06.2025 produced at Annexure-A to the petition, but nothing has been done. [3.0] Perusing the nature of allegations and as the petitioner intends to file a complaint, prima facie, it appears that as to whether offence is made out or not itself is a question of fact. At this stage, it would be apposite to consider the observations made by the Apex Court in the case of M. Subramaniam vs. S. Janki reported in (2020)16 SCC 728 as well as the decision in the case of Imran Pratap Gadhi vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2025 SCC OnLine (SC) 678. [4.0] In view of above, present petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent authority to look into the representation
R/SCR.A/9384/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/07/2025 dated 11.06.2025 (Annexure-A) and after taking into consideration the same and other materials, if any, if the Police Inspector is of the view that the same discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then appropriate directions be issued for registration of the FIR forthwith at the concerned Police Station. However, the Police Inspector, if after going through the materials, is of the view that no case is made out for registration of the FIR, then in such circumstances, he shall inform the petitioner in writing about the same by assigning reasons in brief, preferably within a period of two weeks from today. It is hereby made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the case. Direct service is permitted.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.) Ajay Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/07/2025 17:53:46