M/s. Pragathi Aqua and Mineral Products Pvt. Ltd., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/24537/2025 · 2025-09-11
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45730 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45730 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010474342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE N PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 24537 OF 2025 Between: M/s. Pragathi Aqua and Mineral Products Pvt. Ltd.,, Rep. by it Managing Director, G. Rekha Rani, W/o. Gorripati Venkata Surya Prasad, Aged R/o. 1-38/9, FF-1, Sai Lakshmi Gardens, Chanikyapuri Layout Pothinamallayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 52, ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Mines and Geology Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings Amaravati. 2. The Director of Mines and Geology AP, Off Sri Anjaneya Towers, D.No. 7-104, B-Block, 5th and 6th Floors, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The District Mines and Geology Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. Velagapudi Ibrahimpatnam, NTR District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the Show Cause Notice
NO. 1604/RE and VO/2025-2 dated 06-06-2025 and the consequential Demand Notice dated 31-07-2025 (received on 12-08-2025) issued by the 3rd respondent, District Mines and Geology Officer, Vizianagaram District being contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, predetermined, violative of principles of natural justice, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional, and consequently set aside the same. i , as lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Demand Notice dated 31-07-2025 issued by the respondent. District Mines and Geology Officer, Vizianagaram District, including all further coercive proceedings pursuant thereto, enabling the petitioner to continue quarry operations in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI POSANI AKASH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following order:
APHC010474342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 24537 OF 2025 Between: 1.M/S. PRAGATHI AQUA AND MINERAL PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,, REP. BY IT MANAGING DIRECTOR, G. REKHA RANI, W/0. GORRIPATI VENKATA SURYA PRASAD, AGED 52, R/0.
1-38/9, FF-1, SAI GARDENS, LAYOUT CHANIKYAPURI LAKSHMI POTHINAMALLAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY AP, OFF SRI ANJANEYA TOWERS, D.NO. 7-104, B-BLOCK, 5TH AND 6TH FLOORS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE DISTRICT MINES AND GEOLOGY OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the Show Notice NO. 1604/RE and VO/2025-2 dated 06-06-2025 and the Cause consequential Demand Notice dated 31-07-2025 (received on 12-08-2025) issued by the 3rd respondent. District Mines and Geology Officer, being contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary. Vizianagaram District, as predetermined, violative of principles of natural justice, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional, and consequently set aside the same, and pass
2 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Demand Notice dated 31-07-2025 issued by the 3 respondent. District Mines and Geology Officer, Vizianagaram District, including all further coercive proceedings pursuant thereto, enabling the petitioner to continue quarry operations in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
I.POSANI AKASH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY AAA
3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 24537 OF 2025 The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Posani Akash,
learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sudeepthi Potiuri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents. It is contended that the petitioner is an existing quarry leaseholder for
2. road metal and building stone over an extent of 5.00 hectares in Sy.No.07 of Pedadungada Village, Vepada Mandal, Vizianagaram District. The said lease was transferred in favour of the petitioner vide proceedings of the Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Vizianagaram dated 08.08.2007. The lease is valid up to
31.03.2033. It is further stated that the petitioner has been operating the quarry as per the approved mining plan. It is further contended that a show-cause notice dated 06.06.2025 was
3. issued to the petitioner, alleging that the Vigilance and Enforcement Wing of the Mines and Geology Department along with the Revenue Department, conducted a joint inspection of the petitioner’s quarry lease area. During the said inspection, it was allegedly found that the petitioner had obtained dispatch permits over and above the excavated quantity and misused the transit forms. Thus, the show-cause notice was issued. To the said notice, the petitioner submitted his objections on
27.06.2025. However, in the interregnum, G.O.Ms.No.100 of the Industries and Commerce (Mines-ll)
4 Department, dated 26.06.2025 was issued and brought into force certain amendments to the provisions of the A.P. Minor Minerai Concession Rules,
1966.
4. The learned Senior Counsel argues that although the show-cause notice was issued prior to the issuance of G.O.Ms.No.100. However, while passing the impugned order, the respondents have taken into consideration the APMMC Rules,
1966. It is issuance of a further Counsel contends that the show-cause notice was issued in terms of the provisions of the Rules in force at the reievant point of time, however, while passing of the impugned
order the amended provisions of the Rules have been the petitioner on notice. the amended provisions of Rule 34 of contended that the said order has been passed without i notice to the petitioner. Therefore, the learned Senior applied without putting
5. It IS further submitted that the show-cause notice contains several allegations based on some inspection said to have been conducted by the Vigilance Wing of the respondent Department. It is argued that the said inspection report, which formed the basis for issuance of show-cause notice and was relied upon by the respondents, along with the show-cause notice. was not furnished to the petitioner
6. Having regard to the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition setting aside the impugned order. The respondents are at liberty to pass appropriate orders pursuant to the show-cause notice dated 06.06.2025 after giving liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed explanation.
5 The respondents are directed to furnish a copy of the inspection report to the petitioner. The respondents shall pass appropriate orders after granting time to the petitioner to file a detailed reply to the show-cause notice after furnishing the copy of the inspection report.
7. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall
8. be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Mines and Geology Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati.
2. The Director of Mines and Geology AP, Off Sri Anjaneya Towers, Ibrahimpatnam, NTR D.No. 7-104, B-Block, 5th and 6th Floors, District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. The District Mines and Geology Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District.
4. One CC to SRI. POSANl AKASH Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies. AL
HIGH COURT DATED:12/09/2025
ORDER WP NO. 24537 OF 2025 sT M OCT 2025 XOWiirwt fpy y'-. ■ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS