Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45719 (AP)

V DHANALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25639/2025 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010499102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25639/2025 Between: 1. V DHANALAKSHMI, W/O V. RAMA KRISHNA R/O 11-61/2, FLAT NO. 102, SABARI NIVAS, 5/1 EAST LINE, EAST ANNAPURNA NAGAR, BODAPADU VILLAGE, ANNAPURNA NAGAR, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. U. RENUKA DEVI, W/O U. VENKATA SUBBA RAO, VETERINARY DOCTOR, R/O FLAT NO. 102, SRI KRISHNA RESIDENCY, 5TH LINE, EAST ANNAPURNA NAGAR, NEAR HP PETROL BUNK, GORANTIA, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRIPATHI SIVA JYOTHI, W/O LEILA VENKATESWARA RAO, R/O DOOR NO.14-10, BODAPADU VILLAGE (P), NUNNA (M), VIJAYAWADA RURAL, NTR (ERSTWHILE KRISHNA) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARARAOPET,PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE RURAL CIRCLE INSPECTOR, NARASARARAOPET,PALNADU DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ, order, or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the failure and refusal of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 07.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and direct the respondents to forthwith register the FIR, initiate investigation in accordance with law, and provide necessary protection to the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the private individuals from interfering with or disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the subject land measuring 0.75 acres in Survey No. 229/A, Narasaraopet Revenue Village, Palnadu District and direct the respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners for safeguarding their lawful possession and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ARUDRA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to Issue a writ, order or direction particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring the failure and refusal of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioners’ complaint dated 07.08.2025 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and direct the respondents to forthwith register the FIR, initiate investigation in accordance with law and provide necessary protection to the petitioners and to pass...…” 2. Heard Sri Venkata Rao Arudra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders, giving liberty to the petitioners to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 SNI 4 607 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25639 of 2025 Dated: 22.09.2025 SNI