VANDANA NANDUKUMAR TASGAONKAR v. NANDKUMAR YADAVRAO TASGAONKAR
IA/5636/2025 · 2026-09-08
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4571 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4571 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 3 07-IA-5636-25-IN-WP-887-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5636 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.887 OF 2026 Vandana Nandkumar Tasgaonkar .... Applicant/ Petitioner No.2 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Dr. Nandkumar Yadavrao Tasgaonkar & Anr. .... Petitioners versus Union of India & Ors. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Akshay R. Kapadia a/w Mr. Kishor Lawate, Advocate for Applicant in IA/5636/2025. • Mr. Kuldeep Patil a/w Ms. Sanika Joshi, Advocate for Respondent-CBI. • Ms. Kirti Choube a/w Mr. Govind Javeri, Vidhi Sutar (through VC) i/b. Kumar Legal Research LLP, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Punjab National Bank. • M. S. Bhardwaj a/w Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 08th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :
1. This is an application for amendment in the Writ Petition No.887 of 2026. Learned counsel for the Applicant Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2026.09.11 12:14:26 +0530
2 / 3 07-IA-5636-25-IN-WP-887-26.odt submitted that during pendency of the Petition, the Applicant i.e. the Petitioner No.2 in the original Petition, was dropped as an accused in the charge-sheet by the CBI. He therefore submitted that the this is a relevant factor which needs to be taken into account while considering the main Writ Petition.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the contesting Respondent Nos.3 to 5 submitted that the CBI’s investigation is still going on and therefore that statement may not be accurate.
3. We have considered these submissions. We see no reason to deny amendment to the Writ Petition. The contesting Respondents shall have right to file consolidated reply to the amended Petition and put forth their contention in the additional affidavit-in-reply.
4. Hence, the following order :
O R D E R (i) The application is allowed. (ii) The Applicant is permitted to carry out the
3 / 3 07-IA-5636-25-IN-WP-887-26.odt amendment in the main Petition as per the schedule in this application. (iii) Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today. The amended Petition to be served on all the Respondents. (iv) The Respondent shall be at liberty to file additional affidavit-in-reply to the amended Petition. (v) The application is disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)