Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010536972025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27894/2025 Between:
1. KAMBHAMPATI MADHU, S/O ZADSON, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 76-1-1, HIG FLAT NO. 324, 2ND LANE, HRT APARTMENTS BACKSIDE
HB COLONY, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, NOW NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT OFFICE,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION TEAM SIT OFFICE, M.G. ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NTR COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CENTRAL DIVISION, NTR POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWAD, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. M/S ADVIKA TRADING COMPANY, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORS, VENKATA ADITHYA TADEPALLI AND NAGA SURESH KAPALAVAYI, R/O NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.M.G. ROAD,
2
VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Police authorities, who without any authority of law, has been repeatedly calling the petitioner to the Respondent No.5 police station and making him sit there for prolonged hours without the registration of any crime or any reason or justification and the said actions are arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 police authorities not to call the petitioner unnecessarily to the Respondent No.5 police station without following due procedure established by the law and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5, Police authorities not to call the petitioner to the Respondent No.5 police station unnecessarily without following due procedure established by the law pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27894/2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 5 Police authorities, who without any authority of law, has been repeatedly calling the petitioner to the Respondent No.5 police station and making him sit there for prolonged hours without the registration of any crime or any reason or justification and the said actions are arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 police authorities not to call the petitioner unnecessarily to the Respondent No.5 police station without following due procedure established by the law…=
2. Heard Sri A.Venkata Durga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that without there being any crime registered against the petitioner, the Police are calling the petitioner to the Police Station.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the petitioner is well acquainted with the facts of the case relating to Crime No.248 of 2025 and that he is required to appear before the Investigating Officer along with the relevant documents and information for the purpose of investigation. However, the petitioner did not appear and failed to produce any such documents or information.
5. Recording the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow due process of law to secure the presence of
4
the petitioner before investigation officer for the purpose of investigation. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025 JLV
5
217
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.27894 of 2025
Dated: 16.10.2025
JLV